- Bagel Sync
- Posts
- The Great Fire of London: 80% Burned, Only 6 Lives Lost in 1666
The Great Fire of London: 80% Burned, Only 6 Lives Lost in 1666
Uncover the astonishing story of the Great Fire of London, where 80% of the city burned but only six lives were lost in this incredible historical mystery.

The Great Fire of London: A City in Flames but Few Lives Lost
In September 1666, London experienced one of the most devastating fires in its history. The Great Fire of London raged for four days, consuming over 80% of the city, including 13,200 houses, 87 churches, and major landmarks like St. Paul’s Cathedral.
Despite the massive destruction, historical records state that only six people officially died. This fact seems almost unbelievable, considering the scale of the inferno.
How could such a vast and uncontrolled fire destroy nearly all of London without claiming thousands of lives?
Let’s explore the fascinating story behind this historical paradox.
How the Great Fire Started?
The fire began in the early hours of September 2, 1666, in a small bakery on Pudding Lane, owned by Thomas Farriner, a baker for King Charles II’s navy.
A spark from the bakery’s oven is believed to have ignited nearby materials, quickly spreading flames throughout the wooden structure. At the time, houses in London were built close together, mostly made of wood and thatch, making them highly flammable. Strong eastern winds helped the fire spread rapidly through the city.
Why Did the Fire Spread So Quickly?
Several factors contributed to the rapid and widespread destruction:
Narrow Streets and Wooden Buildings:
London’s medieval layout meant buildings were tightly packed together. The fire jumped from house to house with ease.A Dry Summer:
The summer of 1666 had been particularly dry, leaving wooden structures even more vulnerable to flames.Lack of Firefighting Infrastructure:
The city had no organized fire department. Firefighting efforts consisted of buckets of water, hand pumps, and fire hooks to pull down buildings to create firebreaks.Delayed Action by Authorities:
At first, the Lord Mayor of London, Sir Thomas Bloodworth, underestimated the severity of the fire and refused to take immediate action. By the time King Charles II ordered firebreaks to be created—demolishing entire streets to stop the fire’s spread—it was too late. theater.
How Did Only Six People Die?
Considering the scale of destruction, the official death toll of six people is shockingly low. There are several possible explanations:
People Had Time to Escape
The fire spread gradually rather than instantly engulfing the city. This gave many residents time to evacuate to open areas like Moorfields and the River Thames, where they sought refuge.Records Were Incomplete
The official number of six deaths is based on recorded reports. However, many poor and unregistered individuals likely perished in the fire, especially in slums where records were rarely kept.The Fire Was Not Instantaneously Deadly
Unlike modern fires caused by gas explosions or chemical reactions, the Great Fire spread as a series of advancing flames, rather than a sudden, city-wide catastrophe.Death from Indirect Causes Was Likely Underreported
Many survivors were left homeless, injured, or exposed to harsh conditions. Diseases were rampant in 17th-century London, and some may have died from smoke inhalation, burns, or later illnesses without being officially documented as fire victims.
The Aftermath: Rebuilding London
By September 6, the fire was finally extinguished, thanks to a combination of weakened winds, firebreaks, and coordinated firefighting efforts. However, by then, most of London had been reduced to ashes.
Despite the destruction, the fire had some unexpected positive consequences:
The End of the Plague: The fire effectively wiped out the last remnants of the Great Plague of 1665, as it destroyed many rat-infested areas that had been breeding grounds for disease.
A New City Layout: The rebuilding of London led to wider streets, brick buildings, and improved fire safety measures to prevent future disasters.
The Birth of Fire Insurance: The catastrophe led to the rise of modern fire insurance, with companies offering policies to protect against similar disasters.
One of the most famous figures involved in the city’s reconstruction was Sir Christopher Wren, who designed the new St. Paul’s Cathedral, which still stands today.
A Lesson from History
The Great Fire of London serves as a powerful reminder of how poor urban planning, flammable building materials, and lack of emergency response systems can lead to catastrophe. Yet, it also highlights the resilience of a city and its people, as London was rebuilt stronger and safer than before.
While only six recorded deaths remain part of the official history, the full human cost of the fire may never truly be known. What is certain is that the fire forever changed London’s landscape and led to innovations in urban planning, firefighting, and public safety.
Did You Know?
The Great Fire started on Pudding Lane and ended on Pie Corner—leading some superstitious people to believe it was divine punishment for gluttony!
Samuel Pepys, the famous diarist, recorded the fire in his journal, noting that he buried his parmesan cheese and wine in his garden to save them from the flames.
London’s Monument to the Great Fire, located near the starting point of the blaze, still stands today and offers a panoramic view of the city.